Company governance
Decision Queue
One company-wide register for choices that need evidence, discussion and an accountable conclusion. Each item states the actual question, a recommended starting point, what evidence closes it and the source that created it.
Frame
Agree on the exact decision—not merely the surrounding topic.
Challenge
Review the recommendation, risks, alternatives and missing evidence.
Decide
Name the accountable decision-maker, decision and effective date.
Propagate
Update the source document, roadmap, owner and dependent work.
1 of 31 decisions shown
P1DR-022SalesReady to discussApprove Provider recruitment ownership
Who owns recruiting a Provider: the Registry, the Designer, or both—and who maintains the relationship?
SalesReady to discuss
Approve Provider recruitment ownership
Who owns recruiting a Provider: the Registry, the Designer, or both—and who maintains the relationship?
Why this matters
Designers may bring existing Providers while the Registry recruits vetted network coverage. Duplicate ownership can create conflicting communication and qualification expectations.
Recommended starting point
Allow both sources, but make the Registry the qualification and network-status owner; preserve referral attribution and the Designer’s preferred-relationship context.
Evidence required to close
Provider-source policy, CRM ownership rules and onboarding communication templates.
- Decision owner
- Provider Growth + Operations
- Required timing
- Before Provider outreach scales
Closure standard
A discussion is not a decision until the source changes.
01Decision and rationale recorded02Named accountable owner03Effective date and review date04Source document updated05Roadmap or budget impact applied06Affected people notified07Evidence or assumptions attached08Superseded choice preserved