BC
Brad CodyAdministrator

Company governance

Decision Queue

One company-wide register for choices that need evidence, discussion and an accountable conclusion. Each item states the actual question, a recommended starting point, what evidence closes it and the source that created it.

Open decisions31Across 9 departments
Critical P010Resolve before dependent work
Ready to discuss14Recommendation is prepared
Blocked1External evidence or advice needed
Departments9One shared company queue
01

Frame

Agree on the exact decision—not merely the surrounding topic.

02

Challenge

Review the recommendation, risks, alternatives and missing evidence.

03

Decide

Name the accountable decision-maker, decision and effective date.

04

Propagate

Update the source document, roadmap, owner and dependent work.

Clear

1 of 31 decisions shown

P1DR-012
ProductReady to discuss

Choose the first Provider workflows to take fully live

Which Provider Categories receive deep operational portals first?

Open brief
Why this matters

Nine Provider Categories are supported in the model, but building every category-specific workflow simultaneously would delay proof.

Recommended starting point

Launch Receiving, Warehouse & Storage plus White-Glove Delivery first, then Vendors & Product Suppliers; they create the clearest shared Item-status value for Designers.

Evidence required to close

Two live pilot Providers per selected category and a complete Project workflow test.

Decision owner
Product + Operations
Required timing
Before Project Operations implementation is finalized

Closure standard

A discussion is not a decision until the source changes.

01Decision and rationale recorded02Named accountable owner03Effective date and review date04Source document updated05Roadmap or budget impact applied06Affected people notified07Evidence or assumptions attached08Superseded choice preserved