BC
Brad CodyAdministrator

Company governance

Decision Queue

One company-wide register for choices that need evidence, discussion and an accountable conclusion. Each item states the actual question, a recommended starting point, what evidence closes it and the source that created it.

Open decisions31Across 9 departments
Critical P010Resolve before dependent work
Ready to discuss14Recommendation is prepared
Blocked1External evidence or advice needed
Departments9One shared company queue
01

Frame

Agree on the exact decision—not merely the surrounding topic.

02

Challenge

Review the recommendation, risks, alternatives and missing evidence.

03

Decide

Name the accountable decision-maker, decision and effective date.

04

Propagate

Update the source document, roadmap, owner and dependent work.

Clear

1 of 31 decisions shown

P1DR-030
PeopleReady to discuss

Assign accountable owners for the first operating functions

Who is directly accountable for Product, Technology, Designer Success, Provider Operations, Finance and Brand during the first year?

Open brief
Why this matters

Several critical decisions and production controls currently name functions rather than people, creating founder bottlenecks and invisible gaps.

Recommended starting point

Name one directly responsible person per function now, even when one person holds several roles; publish authority and escalation boundaries.

Evidence required to close

Named responsibility map, weekly cadence and updated registers with real owners.

Decision owner
Founder / CEO
Required timing
Now

Closure standard

A discussion is not a decision until the source changes.

01Decision and rationale recorded02Named accountable owner03Effective date and review date04Source document updated05Roadmap or budget impact applied06Affected people notified07Evidence or assumptions attached08Superseded choice preserved